While it may once have been necessary for the government to provide the mass of the population with schooling, health care, age pensions and other necessities of life, it is not now.
There is no democracy — which is the natural essence of socialism.
First you have to establish real socialism, set the table, create the needed surplus, and then the state can dissolve — which may takes generations.
Communism is the absence of the state and of all classes. Sorry, but the two things are in direct conflict. When the capitalist is free and at liberty, he or she will exploit the workforce, extract more natural resources than we have left to give, and screw over consumers and supply chains with impunity.
The capitalist system is structured in such a way and has the built-in incentives to dramatically exploit workers, consumers and supply chains, and rape the planet without cessation.
Make a killing, not a living. With greater power and wealth, more wealth and power is possible, etc. There is nothing about this anti-democratic system par excellence to even remotely appeal to the vast majority of human beings on this planet.
Yes, predators do very well with this system. It actually opens up the field for predators to include those not already in the ruling class. Was democratic socialism good for democratic consolidations in the post-colonial third world?
The left and right might form an alliance on constitutional political economy because unfettered power loses its shine when it must be shared with your opponents for more than a brief time.
If it does, it will never, ever, not in a million years, put right-wingers back into office. It will also, if well-informed and freethinking, dismantle capitalism and get rid of it once and for all.
That is, if we actually want to improve the quality of life for all, create a sustainable future for everyone, and so on. Neoliberalism would be seen as a major blunder of epic proportions and the right discredited beyond all chances of redemption.
Centrism would be discredited. Even New Dealism would be seen as far too much the compromise which it was. Basically, a well-informed, freethinking people will see that capitalism and a sustainable future are incompatible, to put it mildly.
Pain, for many Americans and Europeans is elsewhere. Out of sight, out of mind.
The World Wildlife Fund estimates that bywe will need two entire earths to meet demand. Capitalism must grow or die. It needs new markets, endlessly, and an endless supply of finite resources to sustain growth. It backs the predators, and we outnumber them by roughly Blunderbuss accusations of dishonesty, illiteracy and idiocy against people who disagree with you do not improve public conversation.
Unlikely imo — but it certainly could be.
Hence, any further comments I see from you on my posts will be alternatively or severally be deleted, disemvoweled, Swedish-Chef-dialectized, Eye-of-Argonized, magimixed, Eated-of-Meaning, hung, drawn, quartered, tarred and displayed on spikes above the four main gates of the city, depending on my ratio of impatience to whimsicality at the time that such further comments come to my attention.
He was one of those proto-systems theorists from the early part of the last century, and he might have benefitted from exposure to lots of them. I think the tragedy is sad indeed, perhaps a loss to 20th century intellectual development. Meanwhile, researches on this kind of problem — under various names, such as autopoiesis, cybernetics, homeostasis, spontaneous order, self-organization, synergetics, systems theory, and so on — have become so numerous that I have been able study closely no more than a few of them.A liberal (alternately called a left-winger or leftist) is someone who advocates an increase in government spending, power, and control, such as pfmlures.comls often support the censorship and denial of biblical Christianity, along with any other views they oppose.
Liberals who are a part of the secular left prefer atheism/agnosticism over the Christian faith, as atheism has no objective. The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum—even encourage the more critical and dissident views.
Nov 27, · Paris is a mess: Up to , illegal immigrants live in just one suburb. A new parliamentary report shows that the number of migrants living in a Paris suburb may be nearing ,, according to Paris Vox.
Neoliberalism or neo-liberalism is the 20th-century resurgence of 19th-century ideas associated with laissez-faire economic liberalism.: 7 Those ideas include economic liberalization policies such as privatization, austerity, deregulation, free trade and reductions in government spending in order to increase the role of the private sector in the economy and society.
The welfare state has also led to an increase in taxes, as more finances are needed to fund the welfare state. These are some of the neo-liberal criticisms of the welfare state. This does not mean that the welfare state should be completely abolished.
Neoliberalism and the welfare state Plenary Lecture, UK Social Policy Association Annual Conference, 8th July